Sunday, April 3, 2011

Magical Mystery of Four and lab notes


Magical Mystery Four: How is working memory capacity limited, and why? (Cowan)


·      George Miller says 7ish chunks, but Cowan says 3-5
·      Chunking: grouping smaller items into larger ones. Perhaps chunking in different ways effects the number of items you can get.
·      So, whats the significance or working memory for cognition?
o   We are relying on it whenever. We are thinking about something/processing it (like the beginning of a sentence should be remembered by the end of it).
o   Working memory may vary and be predictive of cognitive ability
·      What are the ways in which people hold things in working memory?
o   Remembering their voice, mentally, see the situation, running span procedure (don’t know where the end is going to be)
o   Its hard to answer because there are a variety of ways to remember things.
·      Distinguishing  between processing-related and storage-specific measures of wm capacity??
o   Raw info holding capacity- how much is there? Without rehearsing etc. no tricks – this is storage-specific.
·      Cowan regards storage-specific as more important because it’s the core of how the memory processes work, not a contaminated measure by tricks. Etc.
·      How can one ensure storage-specific measurement of capacity? We have to stop other various kinds of processing.
o   Brief simultaneous spatial array
o   Attention taking place after the sound has ended (dichotic listening – report unattended channel.
o   Overt repetitive saying of one word – “the the the the” while trying to remember something
o   Series with unpredictable ending – running span.
·      Why may this be more relevant/important for working memory?
o   Practical implications, maybe sometimes we don’t have time to use those tricks – much of the times, we can’t use tricks so we need to see what the most basic memory is.
·      Cowan sees working memory as needing to be tested without tricks or contaminants.
·      Central memory (working memory) is important because it underlies problem solving and abstract thoughts
·      HE thinks there are developmental trends in memory – it changes across the lifespan, and may predict intelligence. So, it is fundamental to figure out how to measure it.
·      What is the significance of the working memory storage? Is it a strength or a weakness?
o   How can it be a strength?
§  It is a strength in that we don’t have to be overwhelmed with to much info because we can’t store that.
§  Short lists can be organized effectively.
§  An average of 3.5  items seemed to work best
§  Simple means we can manipulate info better
o   How is it a weakness?
§  No more brain tissue to assign to this task, etc.

Lab Notes:
·      Degrees of Freedom – 2-values (f(df1,df2)=____P
·      The difference between _____  and __________ was significant (paired + (df) = ______, p=_______)
·      The standard error of the mean =SD/sqrt(n)
·      Larger sample size = smaller standard error
·      Bonferroni tests: dividing the p-value by the number of tests. A general strategy to control experiment wise error. (how likely that they’re producing false alarms)
·      A 2-way interaction is different at different levels of the 3rd variable
·      There are special tests you can use if you don’t have normal data
o   1-way repeated measures (Friedman)
o   between subjects (Kruskal)
·      The one difficulty of t-tests after ANOVAS is that you can’t control the error overall.

No comments:

Post a Comment